Month: March 2025

  • How to Keep Up with a Changing Bill

    How to Keep Up with a Changing Bill

    Editor’s Note: This article was originally written by Julie Pelegrin and Patti Dahlberg and published on February 6, 2020. The article has been edited where appropriate.

    You’re running late, you’re trying to get a handle on the bills they just called up on special orders, and there are seven bills on your committee calendar for this afternoon. When you need to quickly remind yourself of what’s in a bill, you will be tempted to just check the summary that appears on the first page of the bill. But, unless the bill is in the first committee in the first house, you must resist this temptation. That’s not to say the bill summary printed on a bill can’t be helpful. While the bill summary may not tell you all you need to know, it does provide a quick overview of what the bill is doing when it’s introduced. But beware: If the bill has already passed out of a committee in the first house, it may have been amended by that committee, and those amendments will not appear in the bill summary. In this situation, there may be other options you can turn to.

    Bill Summaries on Introduced Bills

    Rule No. 29 of the Joint Rules of the Senate and House of Representatives requires that every bill and concurrent resolution must include a brief summary written by the Office of Legislative Legal Services (OLLS). These summaries attempt to describe in plain language what the introduced version of the bill or concurrent resolution will accomplish if passed.

    29. BILL SUMMARIES
(a) Every bill and concurrent resolution which is introduced shall include a brief summary thereof to be written by the Office of Legislative Legal Services. Bill summaries shall be formatted and may be updated as directed by the Committee on Legal Services in accordance with Joint Rule 21.
(b) The summary shall not appear on the enrolled copy of the measure.
(c) This summary shall not be treated as a statement of legislative intent.
(d) Repealed, Senate Joint Resolution 10-001. 
(Rule 29 (c) was repealed and Rule 29 (d) was relettered.)

    The OLLS aims to write bill summaries that are brief (relative to the size and scope of the bill) and provide a succinct, clear, and accurate synopsis of the major points of the bill in a format that’s easier to read and, hopefully, understand than the actual language in the bill. Drafters try to avoid using legalistic and technical words in the bill summary, but sometimes using legal terms is necessary to avoid confusion or a misleading summary.

    Bill summaries take many forms and may include:

    • A description of how the bill will change existing statutes and, if useful in understanding those changes, an explanation of existing law and the legal context of the changes;
    • An explanation of the substance of a repealed statute if necessary to understanding the bill;
    • A structure that presents the statutory changes in a logical order, usually the order of importance, and may group related changes together; and
    • If the bill is recommended by an interim or statutory committee, the name of the committee in bold at the beginning of the summary.

    Preamended and Other Bill Versions

    On paper and electronic copies of bills, all bill summaries start with this note:

    Bill Summary
(Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does not reflect any amendments that may be subsequently adopted. If this bill passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at http://leg.colorado.gov.)

    Each bill also has its own page on the General Assembly’s website, which includes the bill summary. There is a note at the end of this summary that specifies which version of the bill the summary applies to. For example, (Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)

    If a bill is amended in a committee or on second or third reading, the bill summary that’s printed on the bill or that appears on an electronic copy of the bill does not changeThis is true whether the amendment occurs in the house of introduction or the second house. So how can you quickly see how a bill may have changed?

    Each bill’s webpage includes links to the text of the official versions of the bill and links to what are called “preamended versions.” These are unofficial versions of the bill that show amendments adopted by a committee as they appear in the text of the bill. The changes made by a House committee are shaded; the changes made by a Senate committee are double-underlined. If you open the unofficial preamended bill, you can easily scroll through it to see any changed language. These changes, combined with the original bill summary, will help you quickly come up to speed on the bill before it’s heard in another committee or on second reading.

    Screen cap from the general assembly website highlighting "Preamended Versions" on the Bill Text tab.

    Once the bill passes second reading, all of the adopted amendments are enrolled into the bill. At that point, you should read the engrossed bill – also available on the bill page. But note: The printed and the electronic version of the bill summary is still not changed. The same is true of the reengrossed version of the bill, created after the bill passes on third reading in the first house. As with the preamended versions, changes made by the House are shaded; changes made by the Senate are double-underlined.

    Updated Bill Summaries – Available Only Online

    So, is the bill summary ever updated? Yes—but never on the bill itself.

    If a bill is significantly amended in the first house, and the original bill summary no longer accurately describes the bill, the bill drafter updates the bill summary when the bill is introduced in the second house. The updated bill summary is posted on the bill’s webpage, but it does not appear on the paper or electronic copy of the bill itself. To make the changes in the updated bill summary readily apparent, new language appears in italics and deleted language appears in strike type. Also, once the bill is introduced in the second house, the note at the bottom of the online bill summary will read: (Note: This summary applies to the reengrossed version of this bill as introduced in the second house.).

    Screen cap of a sample updated bill summary highlighting the note that reads: "(Note: This summary applies to the reengrossed version of this bill as introduced in the second house.)."

    Before considering a bill in the second house, you should check the summary on the bill’s webpage to see how the first house changed the bill. If the online bill summary does not show any language in italics or strike type, then the first house did not significantly amend the bill.

    Final Bill Summary

    After the legislative session ends, the bill drafters prepare a final summary (with no editing marks) for each bill that the General Assembly enacts. The final summary is posted to the bill’s webpage with this note: (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.) The OLLS also collects these final bill summaries and annually publishes them in paper copy and online as the digest of bills for each legislative session.

  • School Finance 101: District Total Program Basics

    by Jacob Baus

    Few things are certain in life. In the General Assembly, school finance is one of the few things that is annually certain.

    School finance has a reputation for being a confusing topic. That is a somewhat fair reputation because it is easy to quickly lose the forest for the trees. But the goal of this article is to try to make school finance less confusing.

    Let us start with the basics.

    Colorado Constitution

    Pursuant to the Colorado Constitution, the General Assembly is responsible “for the establishment and maintenance of a thorough and uniform system of free public schools throughout the state.”[1] This “thorough and uniform” requirement significantly informs much of Colorado’s education policy, especially its school finance policy.

    But what does “thorough and uniform” mean? Generally, the Colorado Supreme Court has held that “…’thorough and uniform’…[provides for] a public school system that is of a quality marked by completeness, is comprehensive, and is consistent across the state [and] does not demand absolute equality in the state’s provision of educational services, supplies, or expenditures.”[2] When examining the school finance formula in light of the thorough and uniform requirement, the Colorado Supreme Court has held that the formula adopted by the General Assembly that calculates every school district’s total program uniformly “is of a quality marked by completeness, is comprehensive, and is consistent across the state.”[3]

    (For more information concerning the Colorado Supreme Court’s analysis of the “thorough and uniform” requirement and its application to school finance, please read the LegiSource article “Supreme Court Upholds General Assembly’s Authority as Education Policymaker”.)

    District Total Program Versus Other Revenue

    A school district’s revenue comes from multiple sources. One revenue source that all Colorado school districts receive is called “district total program.” A district’s total program is the financial base of support for public education in that district.[4] (More detail on where total program funding comes from below.) The school finance formula, codified by the General Assembly, annually determines each district’s total program.

    A school district may have other sources of revenue that are distinct from its total program. For example, a district may receive a grant for a particular purpose such as new computers or federal funding because of the poverty rate of its student population. Additionally, a school district may have obtained voter approval for a bond for a one-time purpose such as a new school facility or a mill levy override (not to be confused with a district mill levy) for an ongoing administrative purpose such as an increase in teacher pay.

    Total Program Formula

    The school finance formula is comprised of distinct elements and factors that are calculated using uniform formulas that apply district-specific characteristics – most commonly, the district’s student population or a specific group of the student population.

    For example, one element of the school finance formula determines the amount of “district English language learner funding.”[5] A district’s English language learner funding is determined by multiplying the number of English language learner students enrolled in the district by a dollar amount that is determined by a standard formula.

    Therefore, if District A has 104 English language learner students, District A’s English language learner funding is determined by multiplying 104 by the English language learner funding amount. If District B has 219 English language learner students, District B’s English language learner funding is determined by multiplying 219 by the English language learner funding amount.

    After all of the formula’s distinct elements and factors[6] are calculated, they are added up, and the result is the district’s total program.

    How is the District’s Total Program Funded?

    Generally, a district and the state each pay a portion of a district’s total program. The district pays its obligation (“local share”) first, and the state backfills the remaining difference between the local share and the district’s total program (“state share”).[7] Given this backfill arrangement, there are instances when a local district is able to fully fund its total program without any state share.

    The local share is comprised of two revenue sources: specific ownership tax revenue and property tax revenue.[8] Specific ownership tax is a tax that is collected on vehicles, and there are some parameters regarding the amount of this total tax revenue that is used for local share purposes.[9] With respect to property taxes, each district is required to levy a certain number of mills (not to be confused with a mill levy override). The number of mills that a district is required to levy for its local share is determined based on district-specific characteristics.[10]

    The state share is comprised of money from the general fund, the state education fund, and the state public school fund.

    What is Next?

    After reading this article, you may have more questions about the topics briefly addressed, such as mill levies or the state education fund. Or, you may have questions about something that was not addressed but you have heard about, such as categorical program funding.

    Hopefully, this article is the first in a series of articles that attempt to achieve the ambitious, and possibly delusional, goal of making school finance less confusing. In the meantime, the Office of Legislative Legal Services, and our sibling agencies, the Legislative Council Staff and the Joint Budget Committee Staff, are available to answer questions or provide available information regarding school finance and what it means for the school districts in your legislative district.


    [1] Colo. Const., art. IX, sec. 2.

    [2] Lobato v. State, 304 P.3d 1132, 1139 (Colo. 2013).

    [3] Id. at 1141.

    [4] Sec. 22-54-103.3 (1), 22-54-103.5 (1), and 22-54-104 (1), C.R.S.

    [5] Sec. 22-54-103.5 (7) and 22-54-104 (4.3), C.R.S.

    [6] Other funding factors include a district’s at-risk funding, extended high school funding, and cost of living.

    [7] Sec. 22-54-106 (1)(b), C.R.S.

    [8] Sec. 22-54-106 (1)(a), C.R.S.

    [9] Sec. 22-54-103 (11), C.R.S.

    [10] Sec. 22-54-106, C.R.S.