Category: History

  • Revisor of Statutes Ensures Access to Colorado’s Laws

    by Julie Pelegrin

    As we explained a couple of weeks ago, the Office of Legislative Legal Services is responsible not only for writing bills and amendments, but also for publishing the statutes. But these functions—drafting and publishing—have not always been housed in the same office or even in the same branch of government.

    The history of publishing statutes in Colorado is long and complicated. Starting in 1861, the Territorial Legislature published the session laws after each biennial legislative session, which contained all of the bills the Legislature passed. Until 1868, if someone wanted to amend a bill that passed in an earlier session, he had to amend the bill as it appeared in the session laws.

    The first consolidation of the state’s laws occurred before Colorado became a state. In 1868, the Territorial Legislature authorized consolidation of the general statutes, all of the laws enacted since 1861 with any amendments to those laws, arranged into 90 chapters, alphabetic by topic. The Territorial Legislature then adopted this consolidation, making it the “positive law” of the state, which means that a person could cite to the section of consolidated statute, rather than having to cite to the act as it was published and later amended in session laws.[i]

    The General Assembly voted to reconsolidate and republish the laws at various times: The General Laws of 1877; the General Statutes of 1883; Mills’ Annotated Statutes of 1891; the Revised Statutes of 1908; the Compiled Laws of 1921; and the Colorado Statutes Annotated of 1935. Each of these, except the Mills’ Annotated Statutes, was created with the General Assembly’s official authorization, but there was not a specific official or office that was consistently responsible for codifying and republishing Colorado’s laws on a regular basis.

    Until 1951.

    That year, the General Assembly adopted House Bill No. 201. Like earlier acts, this act provided for revising and codifying the laws of the state, but with this act, the General Assembly for the first time took a longer view. It created the Committee on Statute Revision within the Judicial Department, chaired by the Chief Justice of the Colorado Supreme Court. The committee consisted of the Attorney General, two Senators, and two Representatives.

    2012 Session Laws of Colorado/photo by Ashley Zimmerman

    The act also created the position of Revisor of Statutes. The act directed the Committee to appoint an attorney to this position and to oversee his work. The Revisor could hire attorney associates and clerical staff to assist him in collating, compiling, editing, and preparing the statutes; publishing the statutes and other important documents like the state and federal constitutions; and creating source notes, annotations, an index, and comparative tables of prior compilations. All of this work was to be completed and submitted to the General Assembly by the 1953 legislative session.

    H.B. No. 201 also directed the Revisor, at the end of each legislative session after 1953, to annotate, arrange, and prepare pocket parts or supplements for the 1953 revision of the statutes. The Office of the Revisor of Statutes was now a continuing enterprise, responsible for maintaining the accuracy of the published statutes on an annual basis. The General Assembly also directed the Revisor to assist the Legislative Reference Bureau (in the Attorney General’s Office) in drafting bills and amendments and engrossing and enrolling bills.

    Finally, a permanent process existed to ensure the published statutes kept up to date. But in 1958, 1959, and 1960, the office fell behind in publishing the pocket parts. So, in 1961, the General Assembly directed the Revisor of Statutes to publish a new recodification, incorporating all of the changes since 1953 into a single set of volumes: the Colorado Revised Statutes 1963. At this time, the Revisor was still working out of the judicial branch.

    In the mid-1960’s, the General Assembly undertook a study of the organization of Colorado’s state government. In 1968, it passed Senate Bill No. 1, concerning the administrative reorganization of state government, which completely reorganized the executive branch of government, and moved the Legislative Drafting Office (LDO) from the Attorney General’s Office to the legislative branch. Then, in 1969, the General Assembly passed Senate Bill No. 396, which created the Office of Revisor of Statutes (ORS) in the legislative branch. Both the LDO and the ORS were under the direction of the Committee on Legal Services.

    Finally, in 1988, the General Assembly passed House Bill No. 1329, which combined the LDO and the ORS into the Office of Legislative Legal Services (OLLS). In combining the offices, the General Assembly named the Director of the OLLS the ex officio Revisor of Statutes, although the Director was authorized to appoint another attorney to serve as the Revisor. This has been the Director’s practice since 1988. The current Revisor of Statutes, Jennifer Gilroy, was appointed March 26, 2004, and is the first woman to serve in this capacity.

    The Revisor’s duties have not changed significantly over time. Under the direction of the Committee on Legal Services, the Revisor must compile, edit, arrange, and prepare for publication the Colorado statutes, the state and federal constitutions, other significant documents, an index of the statutes, and tables comparing the current statutes with previous compilations. Each section of the statutes must have a source note, which provides the history of the section, and annotations of any cases interpreting the section. In publishing the statutes each year, the Revisor, with assistance from legislative editors and attorneys in the OLLS, can correct errors in grammar and punctuation, and may identify other errors or inconsistencies that may be fixed in a revisor’s bill introduced in the next legislative session.

    The most important recent changes to the published statutes are a result of technology. In addition to publishing the entire set of statutes each year, the Revisor oversees the electronic publication of and access to the Colorado Revised Statutes on the internet, on disc, and through e-books.

    The last time the General Assembly recodified and reorganized the entire Colorado Revised Statutes was in 1973. With that recodification, it adopted a numbering convention that provides a great deal of flexibility and room for expansion in the statutes. In the last legislative session, the General Assembly recreated the Statutory Revision Committee to address defects and anachronisms in the law. These provisions make another complete recodification of the statutes less likely.

     

    ________

    [i] See “Colorado Statutes: Past, Present, and Future” J. Myron Jacobstein, 33 Rocky Mountain Law Review, pg 36 (1960-61).

  • Legislature Passes the Laws – But Executive Branch Used to Write Them

    by Julie Pelegrin

    Newly elected legislators are often (pleasantly) surprised to find that they do not have to write their own bills. The Office of Legislative Legal Services – a nonpartisan legislative staff agency – provides expert legislative drafting services to help legislators put their policy ideas into statutory language. But this was not always the case. For over 90 years, Colorado’s legislation was written by employees of the executive branch.

    From the first Legislative Assembly of the Colorado Territory in 1861 until 1917, it’s not clear who was writing the legislation. There is no mention of bill drafting services in the statutes or anywhere else that we can find. Presumably, every legislator wrote his or her own bills, although some may have sought help from private attorneys or the Attorney General. The first mention we find of a bill drafting office is in the 1917-18 biennial report of Colorado Attorney General (AG) Leslie E. Hubbard. He reports that he formed a division within the Attorney General’s office to assist legislators in writing bills. His motivation: To avoid the introduction of bills with “patent inaccuracies, conflicts and constitutional objections” and so reduce the amount of litigation against the state.

    2012 Colorado Revised Statutes/Photo by Ashley ZimmermanIt appears this informal division of the AG’s office continued to operate until 1927. That year, the General Assembly officially created a legislative reference office (LRO) within the Attorney General’s office with the passage of S.B. No. 200. The LRO consisted of one attorney who served as director of the office and at least one stenographer. The Attorney General appointed the LRO director, with the consent of the Governor. S.B. No. 200 also authorized the Supreme Court Librarian to assign library employees to work with the LRO during the legislative session.

    From the beginning, the employees of the LRO were nonpartisan – appointed without reference to party affiliation, solely on the ground of fitness. The director of the LRO had to be an attorney licensed to practice law for at least five years before appointment. And all bill requests were confidential; neither the director nor any employee of the LRO could reveal to anyone outside the office the contents or nature of a bill request without the requesting legislator’s consent. Also, the director and the LRO employees were prohibited from lobbying in favor of or against any type of legislation.

    The LRO had several duties including: Maintaining bill files and information relating to bills; accumulating data and statistics concerning the practical operation of Colorado’s statutes and those of other states; studying the statutes to find ways to reduce the number and bulk of the statutes; and working with the legislative reference bureaus in other states.

    Most importantly, at a legislator’s or the Governor’s request, the LRO was required to draft bills, resolutions, and amendments; advise the legislature or the Governor as to the constitutionality or probable effect of proposed legislation; prepare summaries of existing laws and compilations of laws in other states; and research proposed legislation.

    Although employees of the executive branch were drafting legislation for the legislative branch, the separation-of-powers implications did not seem to cause any concern – at least not until 1968. That year, Senator Bill Armstrong and Representative Star Burton Caywood introduced and passed S.B. 1, concerning the administrative reorganization of state government. This was a massive bill, the product of at least two years of interim committee meetings and planning. The act significantly restructured state government, reducing the sprawling mass of executive branch agencies and offices to just 17 state executive departments.

    S.B. 1 also moved the LRO out of the Attorney General’s office and into the legislative department, renaming it the Legislative Drafting Office (LDO). And the bill created the Legislative Drafting Committee, a bipartisan committee consisting of the three members of leadership in each house and one additional minority party member appointed from each house.

    The new LDO had a director, appointed by the legislative drafting committee without regard to party affiliation, who had to be an attorney. The director could appoint additional attorneys and clerical personnel as necessary to staff the office. The duties of the new LDO were essentially the same as the old LRO, except the attorneys in the LDO could no longer advise the Governor as to whether to sign a bill.

    In 1969, the General Assembly passed S.B. 396, which, among other things, renamed the legislative drafting committee the Committee on Legal Services and changed the membership to consist of eight legislators and the Attorney General – but it remained a bipartisan committee. The General Assembly removed the Attorney General from the committee in 1973 and expanded the membership to 10 legislators in 1985.

    Finally, in 1988, the General Assembly passed House Bill 1329, which combined the LDO and the Office of the Revisor of Statutes into what we now know as the Office of Legislative Legal Services (OLLS). The duties of the OLLS did not change significantly from those exercised by the LDO, but, with the addition of the Office of the Revisor of Statutes, the OLLS is also responsible for revising, codifying, and publishing the statutes.front-door-of-office-1

    Several things about the OLLS have not changed as it has evolved from the executive branch into the legislative branch. Bill and amendment requests and communications between OLLS staff and legislators are all still confidential. The OLLS is still nonpartisan and is still charged with providing legal services. And, finally, the mission of the OLLS continues to be providing “the best technical advice and information … available to the General Assembly, agencies of state government, and the people of this state.”

  • Columbia Beckons from the Pediment, But How Did She Get There? Exploring Colorado Capitol Architecture

    by Darren Thornberry

    Our state capitol is bursting with wonderful architectural nuance, and some of it is not readily apparent as one wanders the halls or the grounds. In fact, I discovered the pediment statuary above the House chamber windows, on the building’s west side, completely by accident. I was standing out there in a crowd of people, waiting for a fancy jet fly-by that was due to happen, and it just caught my eye. It’s fascinating to me how much detail is there, despite the sculptor’s understanding that very few people would ever have a clear view of it. Squinting to see the shapes and forms, I wondered what they represented.

    pedimentBPhoto courtesy of Dr. Derek Everett

    Dr. Derek Everett, former capitol tour guide and author of “The Colorado State Capitol: History, Politics, Preservation,” provided the following information via email about the pediment and the accompanying photo.

    “The pediment statuary was originally designed, as with every other element of the building from floor plans to banister posts, by architect Elijah E. Myers, who’d already won commissions for the capitols in Michigan and Texas. He produced an extensive, complicated description for his vision of an appropriate collection of statuary reflecting Colorado’s experience to the Board of Capitol Managers (BoCM), the body responsible for erecting the building. Here’s his vision from an undated letter, but likely written between 1886-88:

     

    ‘On the extreme right of the sketch is represented the prairie schooner drawn by oxen, representing emigrants coming to the new Territory, while in the roadway partly concealed behind the rocks is the skulking indians [sic] evidently bent on his deadly intent to prevent the advance of civilization. As the emigrants proceeds [sic] on their way he meets the happy greetings of plenty with the outstretched cornucopia. She conveys to him that here is a new home that by his industry and skill that the land will produce for him and his family his horses and cattle abundance, and in obedience to the law greets him with a hearty welcome to the settlement. The next figure is a representation of a statue recording the law of the people, representing legislation, with the open tablet in her hands conveys to him the rights and priviledges [sic] under the law he has granted to him in the protection of himself his family and his property. The centre [sic] figure represents Justice the right hand resting on the book of law, at the left of this statue is the globe, representing the universality of law and benefits of civilization and law affords, the protection of property. On the left of the centre [sic] figure is represented the Mechanical arts. And still further to the left is a representation of the happy home.’

     

    As you can imagine, the cost and complication of creating something so intricate, especially since it would be so crowded and small up in the pediment that few people would be able to appreciate it, dissuaded the BoCM from carrying it out. By 1889, Myers had left the project anyway, and the board made their own call. In September 1890, a few months after the cornerstone ceremony and at a point where little more than the first floor granite walls and the sandstone rotunda core were in place, the BoCM viewed a plaster model of the pioneer family pediment statuary based upon Myers’ work. They revised and simplified it dramatically, and worked with California sculptor Ludwig Oehlmann to make a new plaster model and ultimately carve the sculpture they approved. It consists of a figure representing Columbia (an allegorical stand-in for the United States popular at the time) flanked by figures representing agriculture and mining/commerce. The simplified work was carved early in the 1890s and installed no later than 1892, by which time the granite walls of the building were complete.”

     

    What’s your favorite thing about the capitol building? Let us know on Twitter @LegiSource.

  • “Why Don’t We Fix the Radiator?”: How a Broken Appliance Led to a Dazzling Restoration at the Colorado Capitol

    by Darren Thornberry

    When the chambers of the Colorado Senate and House of Representatives were built in 1894, they were adorned with gold filigree stenciling over red and green paint, respectively, that was the work of Denver artist Manuel Hill. It’s hard to imagine now, but Hill’s beautiful work fell out of favor over the decades, and in 1954 the walls and ceilings of both chambers were covered in acoustic tiles in a décor scandal we now refer to as TileGate.

    The tiles were removed in 2013 and tested for lead and asbestos as part of a multiyear project to restore both chambers to their “historic and regal condition,” as former House Speaker Frank McNulty told The Denver Post.

    It was Speaker McNulty who unintentionally spearheaded the renovations. See, he wanted a tilted radiator in the House gallery fixed. And then, as it turned out, a peek behind the tiles wouldn’t hurt anything, either. After all, black and white photos of the stenciling had tantalized state architects, though no one knew what condition it was in. As the project commenced in 2013, and workers began peeling back the tiles, they were astonished by what they saw.

    Senate Renovation Tile PhotoA photo of the original stenciling underneath the acoustic tiles in the Senate Chambers. Photo shared by Chief Clerk Marilyn Eddins.

    Thus began a huge renovation, funded by the Senate and House budgets and also the state’s capitol construction fund, which included painstakingly recreating the ornate stenciling and restoring the chandeliers in both chambers. Speaker McNulty would ultimately pass the project baton to his successor as House Speaker, Mark Ferrandino.

    On January 6th, more than a half century after it disappeared, the artistry hidden under those infamous acoustic tiles on the ceiling of the House of Representatives was again on display. That day, House Speaker Dickey Lee Hullinghorst officially declared the chamber open, and capitol staffers were invited to see not just the stenciled ceiling but also the restored chandelier in all its glory.

    Many of us walked the planks and braved the ceiling coffer (officially the “lay light space”) in the weeks prior to the reveal, both in the House and the Senate. Who recalls wondering if the scaffolding would really keep you from falling into the Well? (This writer does.) Both the coffer’s flat glass surface and the skylight in the roof above date to the 1890s.

    House of Representatives Ceiling Coffer Photo. Photo Credit: Ashley Zimmerman

    A view of the ceiling coffer in the House of Representatives Chamber prior to the reveal. Photo credit: Ashley Zimmerman

    St. Louis Antique Lighting restored the immense House chandelier to its turn-of-the-20th-century glow. They recreated the top tiers and the top escutcheon plate based on photos and the original chandelier that is still in place in the Supreme Court Chambers. The Senate chandelier is due to be restored during the interim this year.

    Here is an incredible time-lapse film of the House of Representatives restoration process, courtesy of Rocket House Pictures, LLC.

    Replica “Edison” bulbs were installed at the perimeter and ceiling of the House in favor of the originals. Replacing the old cloth-wrapped wiring in the originals, to light them up once again, was simply one project too many.

    During the ceiling restoration process, it was discovered that prior to the most recent stencil pattern found, there was an earlier set of stencils and paintings. In the House, there were shields, eagles, and Greek or Roman profiles. In the Senate, similar profiles were found, as well as what appears to be a portrait of President Lincoln on the back east wall and another portrait on the back west wall. The west side portrait could not be identified due to the glue dobs (to hold the tiles in place) that had been placed over the face on the eyes.

    The Denver Art Museum brought in equipment used to look under paintings to help document the earlier stencils/paintings. State architect Lance Shepherd states that he believes the early stencils/paintings were installed just before legislators moved into the chambers and were meant to be temporary. Likely soon afterward, the stencils now seen in both chambers, and for which there is photographic documentation, were created.

    The recreated stenciling on the ceiling is based on photographs of the original design. A water-based paint was used all those years ago, probably to save money, and most of the ceiling stenciling had been washed away prior to the installation of the acoustic tiles.

    Our House of Representatives and Senate chambers surely are among the most beautiful working legislative spaces in the country, thanks to their restorers’ hard work and attention to detail. May we all work as diligently this session as they did during the interim!

    Author’s Note: Thanks to Lance Shepherd, manager of design and construction programs for the DPA’s Office of the State Architect, for his invaluable contributions to this article.

  • Old Supreme Court Windows Honor Ethnic and Racial Group History in Colorado

    by Melanie Pawlyszyn

    How often have you sat in the Old Supreme Court Chambers and wondered, “Who are those people in the windows?” As it turns out, each window honors persons who played a significant role in the history of various ethnic and racial groups in Colorado.

    The Heritage Windows on the north wall of the old Supreme Court chambers were a gift from the committee that organized the centennial celebration for Colorado in 1976 to honor four ethnic and racial groups – Hispanics, Native Americans, African Americans, and Chinese and Japanese. Members from each group designed the stained glass windows, and the Elysian Glass Company manufactured each window for about $6,000. The windows honoring the African American and Hispanic communities were presented to the state on January 7, 1977, and those honoring Native Americans and Chinese and Japanese communities were dedicated on February 18, 1977.

    Hispanics

    photo by Melanie Pawlyszyn
    photo by Melanie Pawlyszyn

    Don Miera y Pacheco (1721-1785), Father Francisco Atanasio Dominguez, and Father Silverstre Velez de Escalante
    Dominguez and Escalante were Franciscan monks who led an expedition through the uncharted West in 1776. The expedition’s cartographer, Don Miera y Pacheco, is the dominant figure in the window. Pacheco drew up maps and kept a detailed diary of the Dominguez-Escalante expedition that started in Santa Fe, New Mexico, and traveled up through southwestern Colorado to the Great Salt Lake in Utah, and southwest to Monterey, California. The expedition explored more unknown territory than Daniel Boone or Lewis and Clark, though it never met its objective of finding a new route from Santa Fe to Monterey.

    Carlotta Espinosa designed this window, located on the far left-hand side as you face into the Old Supreme Court Chambers.

    Native Americans

    photo by Melanie Pawlyszyn
    photo by Melanie Pawlyszyn

    Chief Jack House (1892-1971)
    The upper half of the window honors Chief Jack House, the last hereditary chief of the Ute Mountain Ute tribe. In his over 30 years of leadership, Chief Jack House worked to secure essential water rights for his tribe, fought for the tribe’s right of self-determination, pushed for improvements of their living conditions, and lobbied for their causes. He helped establish the tribal council, the Ute Mountain Tribal Office, and the blueprints for the tribal constitution.

    Norman Lansing of the Ute Mountain Ute tribe designed this portion of the window, located directly left of the center window.

    Chief Buckskin Charlie (1840-1936)
    The lower half of the window depicts Chief Buckskin Charlie, the last hereditary chief of the southern Ute tribe. Chief Buckskin Charlie, often called “Charlie Buck,” was known as a pacifist leader who mediated peaceful negotiations between the Native Americans of Colorado and the Native American Agency and arranged peace talks in Washington alongside his predecessor, Chief Ouray.

    Before becoming chief of the southern Ute tribe in 1880, Charlie Buck was stationed with the Federal troops at Fort Junior and was honorably discharged. As a Ute chief, he carried out Ute traditions and ceremonies and introduced new methods of farming, education, and health care to his people.

    Eugene Naranjo of the southern Ute tribe designed this portion of the window.

    photo by Melanie Pawlyszyn
    photo by Melanie Pawlyszyn

    Alexander Hunt and Chief Ouray
    The center window in the Chambers is not one of the Heritage Windows. It was a gift from a descendant of Alexander Hunt, the Fifth Territorial Governor of Colorado. Governor Hunt negotiated various peace treaties with Colorado’s Native American tribes, including the Ute Treaty of 1868 with Chief Ouray of the Ute Mountain Ute tribe. In the window, the two leaders share a peace pipe, a symbol of the efforts to establish peace between the white settlers of Colorado and the Native Americans.

    Senate Joint Resolution 76-32 authorized the installation of the window, which replaced a window portrait of Chief Justice Robert Wilbur Steele.

    Aunt Clara Brown
    photo by Melanie Pawlyszyn

    African Americans

    Aunt Clara Brown (1800-1882)
    Clara Brown was sold into slavery at the age of three and was married and gave birth to four children at age 18. She and her children were sold and separated in Kentucky. Brown was emancipated in 1856, after which she sought to find her children. She worked as a cook in St. Louis and then washed and cooked for 25 men to pay for her transport to Colorado in 1959, where the gold rush gave prospects of wealth.

    Brown settled in Central City, where her home became a hospital, hotel, and refuge for all. She helped organize Methodist Sunday school classes at the First Methodist Church in Central City as well as in Georgetown and Denver and aided other African Americans in making their way to the West with the money she earned. She also worked in various ways to help the miners of Central City.

    After saving up $10,000, Brown went back to Kentucky in 1866 to find her children. She found her daughters Margaret and Eliza Jane. She could not find her son Richard, and her third daughter Palina Ann had died at age three.

    Vernon Rowlette designed this window, located directly right of the center window in the Chambers.

    Chinese and Japanese

    photo by Melanie Pawlyszyn
    photo by Melanie Pawlyszyn

    Chin Lin Sou (1837-1894)
    The upper half of the window on the far right of the Chambers depicts Chin Lin Sou, a labor contractor responsible for bringing the first Chinese laborers to the United States for construction work. Chin Lin Sou, nicknamed “Willie Chin,” came to the United States from Canton, China, at age 22 to work on the Kansas Pacific Railroad. He supervised the work of Chinese laborers on the Central Pacific and Union Pacific railroads as well as over 300 Chinese miners in Gilpin County. Willie Chin was one of the founders of the Six Companies and the Chinese Trading and Insurance Companies, which sold supplies to his workers.

    In 1870, Willie Chin became the first mayor of Denver’s Chinatown, Hop Alley, which was razed in 1950 and no longer exists. He helped his people get jobs and establish businesses and defended them against tremendous hostility, including the anti-Chinese riot in Denver on October 30, 1880.

    Chen Ting-Shih designed the window.

    Naoichi Hokazono (1873-1927)
    The lower half of the window depicts Naoichi “Harry” Hokazono, a labor contractor who brought Japanese workers to build much of Colorado’s agriculture, mining, and construction industries. His first venture was to bring 70 Japanese laborers from Wyoming to cultivate sugar beets in Colorado. Eventually, he hired 2,000 men in agriculture, mining, and constructing dams and high-tension transmission lines.

    Hokazono came to San Francisco from Kyushu, Japan, at age 11, and arrived in Colorado in 1898 at age 25. He served as president of the Japanese Association of Colorado, the Japanese Businessmen’s Association, and a printing company that published a Japanese-language newspaper.

    The window was designed by Yuri Noda, a Denver resident who was born in Japan.

    Information in this article can be found in “Memorials and Art In and Around the Colorado State Capitol” by the Colorado Legislative Council (June 1992) and “Our Colorado Immortals in Stained Glass” by Elaine Abrams Clearfield (June 1986).

  • Emily Griffith: Our Lady of Education

    by Darren Thornberry

    It is said that Emily Griffith winks at passersby from her stained glass window outside the Old Supreme Court Chambers. Who knew the pensive lady in purple had a playful side!

    Emily Griffith Stained Glass Window
    Courtesy of Kristal Kraft

    Emily Griffith made indelible contributions to education in Colorado, founded the Opportunity School in downtown Denver, and is beloved to this day for her work with adult and low-income students. In acknowledgement, Senate Resolution 16 adopted during the 1974 session and Senate Resolution 12 adopted during the 1975 session honored Emily Griffith by dedicating a stained glass window portrait of her, which hung in the Senate until 1985.

    It was decided that year to honor longtime Colorado legislator Ruth Stockton with a stained glass window in the Senate. To make space for it, a group of senators chose to move the Griffith window to its current location. In 2000, Mayor Wellington Webb honored Griffith with a posthumous Millennium Award, honoring individuals and organizations that have made significant and lasting contributions to the City of Denver since its founding.

    Though the year of her birth is disputed*, Emily Griffith was born in Cincinnati, Ohio, the eldest of four children. By age 14, she was teaching in a sod schoolhouse in Broken Bow, Nebraska. She soon learned that many of her students’ immigrant parents could neither read nor write in English and didn’t know how to manage their money. These problems struck a chord in the young educator and led her to the idea of a school for adults with a flexible schedule and a wide variety of subjects. In 1895, the Griffith family moved to Denver, and Emily was hired by Denver Public Schools. She taught as both a substitute and full-time teacher and in 1904 became the Deputy State Superintendent of Schools, a position she held for six years.

    In 1915, Griffith shared her hopes for a school with Denver Post writer Frances “Pinky” Wayne, who immediately began to write about it. Within a matter of months, the Denver Board of Education gave Griffith the condemned Longfellow School at 13th and Welton streets. The Opportunity School had a home, and Griffith was there to greet 1,400 students on opening day – Sept. 9, 1916. English, typing, and telegraphy were among the free classes available in those days when the school was open five days a week, 13 hours a day. Griffith was a caring educator, giving away food and money for the streetcar and visiting sick students.

    The function of the school has changed to meet the needs of the public over the years. In World War I, the school Emily Griffith Teachingtrained soldiers and civilians alike. In World War II, for a time, it operated around the clock, training more than 24,000 people in defense work. These days, the renamed Emily Griffith Technical College serves 10,000 students, day and night, with programs ranging from Culinary Arts to Sheetmetal Worker Apprenticeship. The school has assisted more than 1.6 million students in reaching their educational goals since its inception.

    Emily Griffith retired from Denver Public Schools in 1933. Tragically, she and her invalid sister, Florence, were found shot to death at their cabin in Pinecliffe, Co., in June 1947. An associate, Fred Lundy, who committed suicide a few weeks later, has long been suspected in their murders. Still, what really happened remains a mystery.

    Griffith’s legacy of helping people, regardless of age, race, or education level, is honored by the 150 instructors who work at her school today. In addition to being commemorated in stained glass, Griffith is seen in the “Women’s Gold” tapestry, which honors 19 pioneering Colorado women, on the Capitol’s first floor.

    * “Our Colorado Immortals in Stained Glass” by Elaine Abrams Clearfield lists Griffith’s birth year as 1880, Emilygriffith.edu states she was born “in the 1860s,” and Historycolorado.org shows her birth year as 1868.

  • Spooky Oddities at the State Capitol

    by Ashley Zimmerman

    As with many old, historical buildings, a number of ghost stories haunt the Colorado state capitol. Officially, there are no ghosts to be found in the building. However, those of us who have smelled an odd perfume, seen an odd figure, or heard an odd hoof beat know better. In honor of Halloween, we present to you a few of the most notable ghosts that unofficially haunt our halls.

    The Bloody Espinosas

    Perhaps the most well-known story of the capitol, this tale begins in 1863. Back then, the Colorado settlement was four years young, and the Gold Rush had brought a curious crowd to the territory. Denver was less a big city and more a town full of tents and temporary occupants hoping to make it rich. A few smaller mining towns were popping up throughout the state as gold was discovered, including Breckenridge, Colorado City, and Black Hawk, but these developments upset many people who already lived in the area. Two brothers from New Mexico, Felipe and Vivian Espinosa, were especially irate at the pioneers moving onto their land in the San Luis Valley and, for the better part of 1863, were intent on killing as many of the new residents as they could. Numbers of the murdered vary, but it’s believed they killed between a dozen and 30 people in just a few months.

    Accounts of how the brothers’ bloody careers ended differ, but eventually the brothers were killed, likely by a volunteer group of citizens from Park County. Their heads were brought to the capitol to collect the bounty set by the governor, but the governor refused to pay and no one knew what to do with the heads. They were first kept in the Treasurer’s Office in the capitol building but were later moved to the sub-basement beneath the capitol. Eventually, the heads were destroyed in the furnace.

    Since then, it’s been said that the heads of the Espinosa brothers can be seen floating through the building after dark. And if you’ve ever heard the sound of horses galloping up and down the main staircase, well, that’s just the Bloody Espinosas…looking for their heads!

    Ghost on stairs

    The Victorian Apparition

    On the third floor of the capitol building, rumor has it that you can see the ghostly visage of a woman wearing Victorian-era garments. She appears out of a mist near the entrance to the senate chambers and then floats off to either side of the chamber before disappearing.

    The Woman in a Long Dress

    A female spirit, appearing in a long, turn-of-the-century dress, is said to wander the steam tunnels beneath the capitol, as well as the capitol building and all the buildings connected to the tunnels in the Capitol Hill area. She’s been seen reading over the shoulders of employees in each of the buildings.

    The Mysterious Tunnels

    Certainly the steam tunnels under the capitol building lend themselves to spooky stories and an overall heightened awareness. In addition to The Woman in a Long Dress, there have been reports of odd cold spells, during which keys, ID badges, and other items are pulled away from the body of the owner and lifted into the air by an unseen force.

    General Spookiness

    While the above stories illustrate a few of the known spirits, there are still a few more spooky happenings in the capitol building that don’t have a known explanation:Ghosts-of-riddle-house

    • In the early hours before business gets going, and in the late hours well after business is done for the day, it’s said that the temperature in many areas of the capitol suddenly drops and a vintage, rose-scented perfume permeates the air before disappearing without a trace as the temperature returns to normal.
    • When business is done for the day, voices, conversations, and footsteps can be heard in and around empty meeting rooms and offices.

    For more information on the eerie and unexplained happenings under the Dome, visit Colorado Central’s two-part story on the Espinosa brothers here and here, as well as the New York Times archival report on the brothers, and “Colorado Legends and Lore: The Phantom Fiddler, Snow Snakes, and Other Tales” by Stephanie Waters.

  • The Land Where the Columbines Grow

    by Ashley Zimmerman

    It’s a common sight in the capitol every year or so – school kids gleefully working with legislators to learn how a bill becomes a law and to make their own impact on the state by presenting a bill to designate a state symbol. This tradition goes back more than 100 years, to when the white and lavender Columbine flower became the state flower of Colorado. (more…)

  • Verifiable Oddities in Colorado’s History-The Snowshoe Chaplain of the State Senate

    by Ashley Zimmerman

    His face appears on a stained glass window in the dome of the Colorado capitol. He arrived in Colorado in the summer of 1861, delivered mail on snowshoes throughout the mountain range, and delivered nearly daily sermons in gold rush towns. In 1885, the Colorado Senate welcomed him as the first Senate Chaplain. His name was John L. Dyer. (more…)

  • Need a Hint? Tips For Legislators

    by Nate Carr

    Most of us appreciate getting a few pointers every now and then. With the start of a new legislative session, you might find it interesting to learn some of the advice given to your predecessors 111 years ago in the Colorado Legislative Manual – 1901 edition:

    1)    Avoid personalities in debates.

    2)    Do not crowd through too many bills.

    3)    Watch your bills and keep pushing them forward at all times.

    4)    Read section 40 of article V of the state constitution.

    5)    Be as regular as possible in attendance. It is the watchful and attentive member who advances legislation.

    6)    Endeavor to be present at roll call at the morning session and listen to the reading of the journal, that action on your measures and your own movements be correctly recorded. If the journal as read is in error, ask to have it corrected.

    7)    After your measure has been considered in committee of the whole, ask the clerk to permit you to see that all amendments and alterations are properly incorporated into your measure.

    8)    On the last day of session, have all surplus stationary and supplies in your desk or committee room collected and turned over to the secretary of state, for use at the next session. This is both law and practical economy.

    9)    The legislative session closes at midnight on the ninetieth day. It has sometimes been the practice to stop the clock, and proceed with business beyond that hour, but this can be prevented by simply entering a protest for record on the journal.

    Words of wisdom written long ago can be as useful now, in many respects, as they were back then. Although stopping the clock to proceed with business beyond the constitutionally mandated time for sine die probably would not be tolerated today.